Skincare Reviews with the Planet in Mind

Published on September 28, 2025 at 11:55 PM

When it comes to skincare, not all products are created equally, especially when we look at their environmental impact. Some products still use animal-testing, damaging chemicals, and non-recyclable packaging. This article will explore what big-name brands are doing and what alternatives there are to each.

Procter & Gamble 

Pros

1. Has pledged 100% recyclable/renewable packaging by 2023 to cut virgin plastic use per product

2. Achieved zero manufacturing waste to landfill

Cons

1. Still relies on single-use plastics and hard-to-recycle pouches

2. Criticized for deforestation risks in paper-based products

Alternatives 

Ethique

Fully plastic-free beauty and skincare bars with compostable packaging.

"We seek to deliver Environmental Impact at three levels: reducing our own impact, helping consumers to reduce their impact, and helping scale solutions across industries." (P&G-Environmental Sustainability)

Garnier 

Pros 

1. Certified cruelty-free and working toward more recycled packaging

2. Introduced some refill stations and solid shampoo bars

Cons

1. Most products are still plastic-heavy

2. Their “Green Beauty” campaign is more future promise than present reality

Alternatives

UpCircle Beauty

Zero-waste skincare that uses upcycled coffee grounds and fruit seeds in glass/aluminum packaging. 

Neutrogena 

Pros 

1. Wide accessibility and some new refill pouches

2. Has invested in more “clean beauty”

Cons

1. Heavy reliance on non-biodegradable wipes

2. Plastic-heavy packaging dominates the lineup

Alternatives 

Plaine Products

Refillable skincare and body care in reusable aluminum bottles

Quote from lawsuit: "Unfortunately, rather than truly creating the plant-based products that consumers desire, Defendant has just repackaged a principally synthetic product and deceptively marketed it as 'plant-based,' thereby misleading reasonable consumers and violating the law,”

Estee Launder Companies 

Pros 

1. Committed to net-zero carbon emissions and renewable energy

2. Expanding refill stations for some luxury skincare lines

Cons

1. Still relies on non-recyclable luxury packaging (glass, pumps, plastics)

2. Transparency on ingredient sources is limited

Alternatives 

Tarta Harper

Natural luxury skincare with refillable jars, farm-to-face transparency, and eco-friendly packaging.

More Alternatives 

Check out Good One You to discover thousands of brand reviews on anything you can think of!

Add comment

Comments

There are no comments yet.